What is IQjack?

A new word for a familiar problem: when prejudice hijacks judgement, or racism hijacks a conversation.

How do you use it?

• “We were discussing someone's qualifications until the conversation was IQjacked by stereotypes.”
• “That sounds like an IQjack moment. What evidence supports the assumption?”
• “Let's challenge the comment rather than label the person.”

These are illustrative sentences, not independent historical attestations of the term.

Why the word matters

Racism can appear as casual banter or unjustified assumptions at work, online and in our social circles. IQjack offers a short, memorable way to pause, question and challenge prejudice constructively. It is gender-neutral and can describe behaviour by anyone, regardless of race, nationality or background.

The word does not measure someone's intelligence, and it is not a label for every awkward question, disagreement or cultural discussion. Context and evidence matter. When someone is harmed, prioritise their safety and wishes.

Where did IQjack come from?

IQjack is a proposed expression introduced in October 2026 by Fawaz F. Ateem and the team at Malak Foundation, Australia, through the Another IQjack? language and awareness initiative. “IQ” is used figuratively for judgement; “jack” evokes the hijacking of thoughts or conversation. This is a new proposed word, not currently an established dictionary entry.

How can you bring it into your workplace?

Invite a thoughtful conversation rather than using the word as a personal insult. For example: “That comment relies on a stereotype. Could we judge the person by their experience instead?” Use IQjack to recognise and question behaviour, not to shame colleagues or shut down legitimate discussion.

Explore the initiative

Try the seven-scenario awareness challenge, practise bystander responses and create a shareable reaction card. No account is required.